As cosmetic procedures receive increasing attention from the media, female genital cosmetic surgery FGCS has become quite popular in Korea. The safety and efficacy of these surgeries and procedures have yet to be thoroughly documented. We report a case of a year-old woman who underwent a vaginal sling implantation, which resulted in the misdiagnosis of a rectal subepithelial tumor during endoscopic mucosal resection EMR. This patient suffered an iatrogenic rectal perforation during the EMR, which necessitated an exploratory operation. The sling implant was removed via the vaginal approach, and a primary repair of the vaginal and rectal walls was performed.
Account Options
Indexed in
Either your web browser doesn't support Javascript or it is currently turned off. In the latter case, please turn on Javascript support in your web browser and reload this page. The present study aimed to determine the differences in outcomes between natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-assisted vaginal hysterectomy NAVH and conventional laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy LAVH. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients who between July and September , were diagnosed as having benign uterine disease such as uterine myoma, endometriosis, or adenomyosis and managed via NAVH or LAVH in a single-center Eulji University Hospital. NAVH and LAVH recipients were matched in terms of baseline characteristics, and the 2 groups were compared regarding surgical outcomes. Of the patients with benign uterine disease included in the present study. There were significant differences between the groups regarding operation time and hemoglobin change.
Background
Either your web browser doesn't support Javascript or it is currently turned off. In the latter case, please turn on Javascript support in your web browser and reload this page. As cosmetic procedures receive increasing attention from the media, female genital cosmetic surgery FGCS has become quite popular in Korea. The safety and efficacy of these surgeries and procedures have yet to be thoroughly documented. We report a case of a year-old woman who underwent a vaginal sling implantation, which resulted in the misdiagnosis of a rectal subepithelial tumor during endoscopic mucosal resection EMR.
Laparoscopic upper vaginectomy for post-hysterectomy high risk vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia and superficially invasive vaginal carcinoma. Background: The aim of this study is to describe the feasibility and efficacy of the laparoscopic upper vaginectomy LUV in vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia VAIN and superficially invasive vaginal carcinoma. Methods: We studied patients with vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia VAIN 2, VAIN 3, and superficially invasive vaginal carcinoma after hysterectomy who have been under laparoscopic upper vaginectomy between March and March The mean age was All the patients restituted bladder function after the removal of the foley catheter. Mean hospital stay was 2 days. Two patients had postoperative complications. One patient with warfarin administration had vaginal stump bleeding and another developed vesico-vaginal fistula. Three of the patients had no residual lesion, but 1 patient had VAIN 1 in the resection margin.